FUW TRENDS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL

(A Peer Review Journal)
e–ISSN: 2408–5162; p–ISSN: 2048–5170

FUW TRENDS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL

CADMIUM, LEAD AND MERCURY CONTENTS IN SOME KEYPADS OF CELLULAR PHONES SOLD IN ZARIA, NIGERIA
Pages: 171-174
Zakka Israila Yashim and Yakubu Ali Dallatu


keywords: Absorption, cell phones, health risk, heavy metals, keypads, toxins

Abstract

The aim of this research work is to determine the levels of cadmium, lead and mercury in some keypads of cellular phones sold in the market within Zaria, Nigeria. The keypads of some cellular phones coded NK, TN, SS and LF were obtained from phones market within Zaria metropolis. Samples were digested with strong acids (mixture of H2SO4 and HNO3 ratio 1:1). The concentration of cadmium and lead were determined using Atomic absorption Spectrophotometer, while mercury was determined using cold vapour Atomic absorption Spectrophotometry. The results obtained showed that concentrations of cadmium in the various keypads were: SS (2.10±0.06 mg/kg), NK (1.90±0.05 mg/kg), TN (1.40±0.04 mg/kg) and LF (BDL); Lead concentrations were: SS (20.20±0.04 mg/kg), NK (26.10±0.04 mg/kg), TN (26.00±0.04 mg/kg) and LF (26.50±0.10 mg/kg); Mercury concentrations were: SS (160.70±0.15 mg/kg), NK (197.70±0.09 mg/kg), TN (140.60±0.04 mg/kg) and LF (156.60±0.10 mg/kg). The metals levels were found to be lower than the recommended standard given by the Directorate for the Restriction of Hazardous Substance (RoHS) for components of electronic products. Continuous use of these keypads can lead to greater absorption of the metals into the human body which can pose health risk. When cell phones are improperly recycled or end up in landfills, it can leak into the groundwater and bioaccumulate in the food chain causing detrimental damage to the soil, water supply, vegetation, animals and humans.

References

Dimitrakakis E, Janz E, Bilitewski B & Gidarakos E 2009. Determination of heavy metals and halogens in plastics from electric and electronic waste, Waste Manage 29: 2700–2706. European Commission-RoHS Directive 2011. Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment” 2002/95/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union L37: 19–23. Fishbein BK 2002. Waste in the wireless world, the challenge of cell phones. New York: INFORM Inc. Garber L 2012. Chemicals in e-waste and e-waste effects to the human body www.e-wastecycle.com Retrieved on 28/02/2017. Hamann CR, Hamann D, Richardson C & Thyseen JP 2014. Mobile Phone Dermatitis in Children and Adults: A Review of the Literature. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology. Hester RE & Harrison RM 2009. Electronic Waste Management (Eds), RSC Publishing, Cambridge. Joaquin N, Leigh F, Mihoyo F, Robert M, Sarvy M & Vered DB 2006. End- of- Life Management of Cell phones in the United States. MSc Thesis submitted to School of Environmental Science and Management, University of Calfornia, Santa Barbara. Kasper AC, Berselli GBT, Freitas BD, Tenorio JSA, Bernardes AM & Veit HM 2011. Printed wiring boards for mobile phones: Characterization and recycling of copper. Waste Manage 31: 2536-2545. Konstantinos GM, John NH & Evanelos G 2013. Quantitative and qualitative Determination of heavy metals in waste cellular phones. Waste Management, 13: 1016–1023. Kyle W 2012. Chemical analysis of new phones. www.infixit.org Retrieved on 28/02/2017. Lim SR & Schoenun JM 2010. Toxicity potentials from waste cellular phones, and waste management policy integrating consumer, corporate, and government responsibilities. Waste Manage, 10: 1653–1660. Lin KL, Chang WK, Chang TC, Lee CH & Lin CH 2009. Recycling thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) waste glass produced as glass-ceramics. J. Clean Prod 16: 1499-1503. Lizette B 2014. Cell phone allergies are real. Medical Daily. www.medicaldaily.com Retrieved on 28/02/2017. Lucente P, Pazzaglia M, Tosti A & Vincenzi C 2000. Contact Dermatitis from Nickel in Mobile Phones. Contact Dermatitis, NY USA. Maroqkos KH, Hahladakis JN & Gidarakos E 2013. Qualitative and quantitative determination of heavy metals in waste cellular phones. Waste Management, 33(9): 1882 – 1892. Schluep M, Hagelueken C, Kuehr R, Magalini F, Mauer C, Meskers C, Mueller E & Wang F 2009. Recycling – From e-waste to resources, Final report. United Nations Environment Programme United Nations University. Stenvall E, Tostar S, Boldizar A, Foreman MR & Moller K 2013. An analysis of the composition and metal contamination of plastics from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Waste Management, 33(4): 915 – 922. Stutz M, Burkhard C & Ertel J 2002. Cost elements of recycling and the design of mobile phones in the context of WEEE, Paper presented at proceedings of care innovation, Vienna, Austria. Townsend TG, Jang YC, Ko HC, Pearson B, Spalvins E & Wadanambi L 2003. Assessment of true impacts of e-waste disposal in Florida (annual report). State University system of Florida, Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Report #04-0232008. Toxic and Hazardous Materials in Electronic 2001. An environmental scan of toxic and hazardous materials in IT and Telecom products and waste. Five Winds International. Ottawa, Canada. Tsydenova O & Bengtsson M 2011. Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manage 31: 45-58. USEPA 1994. Mercury Usage and Alternatives in the Electrical and Electronics Industries. Yazici EY & Deveci H 2013. Extraction of metals from waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs) in H2SO4–CuSO4–NaCl solutions. Hydrometallurgy, 139: 30–38. Zhang HC, Li J, Shrivastava P & Gao Z 2004. Printed circuit board recycling: A state-of-the Art Survey. IEEE Transaction on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 27(1).

Highlights